From: Stephane Eranian <eran...@google.com>

No need to set evsel->fd to NULL after calling perf_evsel__free_fd(), as
this method already does that.

Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efa...@gmx.de>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-wu6kul8fpapr8iyqm685e...@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index 22e18a26b7e6..55407c594b87 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -1081,7 +1081,6 @@ void perf_evsel__close(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int 
ncpus, int nthreads)
 
        perf_evsel__close_fd(evsel, ncpus, nthreads);
        perf_evsel__free_fd(evsel);
-       evsel->fd = NULL;
 }
 
 static struct {
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to