On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 07:35:04PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:19 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfie...@fieldses.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:10:09PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> >> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszer...@suse.cz>
> >>
> >> If this flag is specified and the target of the rename exists then the
> >> rename syscall fails with EEXIST.
> >
> > Why is this useful?
> >
> > (I'm sure it is, it'd just be useful to have the reasons recorded
> > someplace.)
> >
> >> The VFS does the existence checking, so it is trivial to enable for most
> >> local filesystems. This patch only enables it in ext4.
> >>
> >> For network filesystems the VFS check is not enough as there may be a race
> >> between a remote create and the rename, so these filesystems need to handle
> >> this flag in their ->rename() implementations to ensure atomicity.
> >
> > Till that's done this should probably result in -EOPNOTSUPP on those
> > filesystems?
> >
> > I think this would need new protocol in the NFS case.
>
> Yes, it needs to be enabled on a case-by-case basis.
Oh, right, I missed all those
if (flags)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
added with "vfs: add renameat2 syscall". Apologies.
> Only enabled for
> ext4 now, but trivial to do for most fs.
Got it, thanks!
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
