If an object does not exist, AE_NOT_FOUND is returned by evaluate_object.
If the package is empty or has insufficient elements, something like
AE_AML_OPERAND_VALUE is returned.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lan, Tianyu
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 7:07 AM
> To: Matthew Garrett
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki; Dmitry Torokhov; l...@kernel.org; linux-
> a...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; f...@adinet.com.uy;
> l...@dorileo.org; Zheng, Lv; Moore, Robert
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ACPI/Battery: Add a _BIX quirk for NEC LZ750/LS
>
> On 01/15/2014 10:47 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:42:31PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c index
> >> fbf1ace..e98fa83 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> >> @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static int acpi_battery_add(struct acpi_device
> *device)
> >> device->driver_data = battery;
> >> mutex_init(&battery->lock);
> >> mutex_init(&battery->sysfs_lock);
> >> - if (acpi_has_method(battery->device->handle, "_BIX"))
> >> + if (acpi_evaluate_object(device->handle, "_BIX", NULL,
> >> + &buffer);)
> >> set_bit(ACPI_BATTERY_XINFO_PRESENT,
> >> &battery->flags);
> >
> > Doesn't acpi_evaluate_object() return 0 on success? I think:
> >
> > if (ACPI_SUCESS(acpi_evaluate_object(device->handle, "_BIX", NULL,
> > &buffer))
> >
>
> Yes, Sorry for oops.
>
> > But maybe we should check for existence first and give an FW_BUG
> > message to indicate an invalid _BIX?
>
> Yes, this is a good idea.
>
> Another point, the acpi_evaluate_object should return different error code
> for these two cases(no _BIX and wrong size.). I wonder whether we can use
> the error code to determine it belong which case?
> >
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Tianyu Lan
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z� �w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i
