On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:07:05AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 22:42 +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > This patch is a RFC and part of a series Daniel Borkmann and me want to
> > do when introducing prandom_u32_range{,_ro} and prandom_u32_max{,_ro}
> > helpers later this week.
>
> > -static inline u32 reciprocal_divide(u32 A, u32 R)
> > +struct reciprocal_value reciprocal_value(u32 d);
> > +
> > +static inline u32 reciprocal_divide(u32 a, struct reciprocal_value R)
> > {
> > - return (u32)(((u64)A * R) >> 32);
> > + u32 t = (u32)(((u64)a * R.m) >> 32);
> > + return (t + ((a - t) >> R.sh1)) >> R.sh2;
> > }
>
> I would rather introduce new helpers and convert users that really need
> them.
>
> For instance, just use a divide in BPF, because doing this on JIT might
> be too complex for the gains. Strangely, libpcap doesn't seem to
> optimize any divide, like divides by a power of two...
>
> Reciprocal were added 7 years ago, for very specific uses, but current
> cpus have reasonably fast dividers.
Agreed. The new algorithm would need to change the size of struct
sock_filter, which is exported to user space. We will leave BPF as-is
for the time being and check that later.
Greetings,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
