On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 12:15:21PM +0800, Yi Zhang wrote: > I met a scenario: > As soon as the interrupt is triggered, a wakelock is needed to be held > until the threaded handler finishes, > I think we may hold it in the primary interrupt handler, but now it's > NULL by default;
This sounds like something we should just support in the core, though to be honest I'd expect the interrupt core to hold a wakelock itself during interrupt processing. If we're doing it in regmap then allowing the caller to set a wakelock to hold seems better than making them all write the code to take and release it.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
