On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 11:59 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Btw, since you're clearly at the keyboard now: I do agree with Christoph > that it would be a lot cleaner to just say that all architectures have to > have a arch_align_stack() define, instead of having a > __HAVE_ARCH_ALIGN_STACK define. > > After all, a trivial implementation would apparently just be > > #define arch_align_stack(x) (x) > > which is not too much of a bother to maintain for an architecture that > doesn't want to do this ;)
yes I will make this change and post it a bit later (I want to at least test compile it for a few) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
