From: Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl> Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 14:00:22 +0100
> 0) These two patches are very similar. They both clean up a function to > help GCC understand the codeflow. Both help silence a warning. > > 1) Compile tested only (on 32 bits x86). I do not have this hardware. > > 2) Please note that there's no MAINTAINERS entry for mlx4_core. (Neither > is there an entry for the MLX4 IB driver.) Shouldn't it be added? These patches have been rotting for a week. I know the mlx4 folks said the SRIOV guy inside Mellanox will look at it, but this is taking way too long. This is absolutely unreasonable from Paul's perspective to have to wait this long for a review of these relatively simple patches. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
