On Wed, 8 Jan 2014 23:37:49 +0200 Pekka Enberg <penb...@kernel.org> wrote:

> The patch looks good to me but it probably should go through Andrew's tree.

yup.

page_mapping() will be called quite frequently, and adding a new
test-n-branch in there will be somewhat costly.  We might end up with a
better kernel if we were to instead revert 8456a648cf44f.  How useful
was that patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to