On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 11:26:04AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 12/30/2013 07:15 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > >I think it is better to check for this in a seperate function and use > >err_printk instead of dev_warn in the end to print the errors. > >The new function can then be called in the dma_debug_device_change > >callback like device_dma_allocations is. > > > > I did explore separate function option and backed off from it since > the new routine will have to duplicate what device_dma_allocations() > does except that it checks for entry->map_err_type. > > I still have the patch that does that saved away. If you still > prefer that approach, I can rework the patch and send it.
You can get rid of the code duplication by defining for_each macros for the list traversals. So I would still prefer to have this check in a seperate function. Joerg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/