On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 11:26:04AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 12/30/2013 07:15 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >I think it is better to check for this in a seperate function and use
> >err_printk instead of dev_warn in the end to print the errors.
> >The new function can then be called in the dma_debug_device_change
> >callback like device_dma_allocations is.
> >
> 
> I did explore separate function option and backed off from it since
> the new routine will have to duplicate what device_dma_allocations()
> does except that it checks for entry->map_err_type.
> 
> I still have the patch that does that saved away. If you still
> prefer that approach, I can rework the patch and send it.

You can get rid of the code duplication by defining for_each macros for
the list traversals. So I would still prefer to have this check in a
seperate function.


        Joerg


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to