On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Mateusz Guzik <mgu...@redhat.com> wrote: > I can't comment on the concept, but have one nit.
FYI: The concept is something that has been in the works and at least ackd on by the current maintainer of audit: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=138660320704580&w=2 > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 07:30:30AM -0800, William Roberts wrote: >> +static void audit_log_cmdline(struct audit_buffer *ab, struct task_struct >> *tsk, >> + struct audit_context *context) >> +{ >> + int res; >> + char *buf; >> + char *msg = "(null)"; >> + audit_log_format(ab, " cmdline="); >> + >> + /* Not cached */ >> + if (!context->cmdline) { >> + buf = kmalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!buf) >> + goto out; >> + res = get_cmdline(tsk, buf, PATH_MAX); >> + /* Ensure NULL terminated */ >> + if (buf[res-1] != '\0') >> + buf[res-1] = '\0'; > > This accesses memory below the buffer if get_cmdline returned 0, which I > believe will be the case when someone jokingly unmaps the area (all > maybe when it is swapped out but can't be swapped in due to I/O errors). > Yeah that's not a nit, that's a serious issue and I will correct. Thanks. > Also since you are just putting 0 in there anyway I don't see much point > in testing for it. > >> + context->cmdline = buf; >> + } >> + msg = context->cmdline; >> +out: >> + audit_log_untrustedstring(ab, msg); >> +} >> + > > > > -- > Mateusz Guzik -- Respectfully, William C Roberts -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
