On 12/27/2013 08:07 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 12/27/2013 08:13 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote: >>> >>> Back to my question, assume cpu1 will be off-lined and one irq affinity is >>> set as (1, 2) -- this irq will be bypassed. Looks good. But if one irq >>> affinity is set as only (1), -- this irq is bypassed, too. Not right! >> >> Oh, yes, this is a bug. ... and as you point out ... >> > > Does this mean the patch that is currently in my tree should not be > pushed to Linus? It sounds like that to me...
Yes, hpa -- please drop the patch. I will resubmit an updated patch after testing. P. > > -hpa > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
