Em Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 09:14:46AM -0500, David Ahern escreveu:
> On 12/26/13, 12:41 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >@@ -180,7 +181,20 @@ static int opt_set_target(const struct option *opt,
> >const char *str,
> > else
> > return ret;
> >
> >- params.target = str;
> >+ /* Expand given path to absolute path, except for modulename */
> >+ if (params.uprobes || strchr(str, '/')) {
> >+ tmp = realpath(str, NULL);
> >+ if (!tmp) {
> >+ pr_warning("Failed to find the path of %s.\n",
> >+ str);
>
> That error message will be misleading if it is generated. How about:
> Failed to get the absolute path of %s: %d\n", str, errno.
Changed it to:
pr_warning("Failed to get the absolute path of %s: %m\n", str);
> >+ return ret;
> >+ }
> >+ } else {
> >+ tmp = strdup(str);
> >+ if (!tmp)
> >+ return -ENOMEM;
> >+ }
> >+ params.target = tmp;
>
> When is params.target freed?
> David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
