Re: [PATCH] x86 idle: repair large-server 50-watt idle-power regression

[Ingo Molnar]

* H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com> wrote:

> On 12/19/2013 04:22 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> >> index 92d1206..f80b700 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> >> @@ -377,6 +377,9 @@ static int intel_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> >>  
> >>    if (!current_set_polling_and_test()) {
> >>  
> >> +          if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH_MONITOR))
> >> +                  clflush((void *)&current_thread_info()->flags);
> >> +
> >>            __monitor((void *)&current_thread_info()->flags, 0, 0);
> > 
> > I don't think either of these casts to '(void *)' is needed, both the 
> > clflush() and __monitor() will take pointers.
> 
> __monitor() currently doesn't, which is idiotic.

Hm, __monitor() seems to take a void *:

 arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:static inline void __monitor(const void *eax, 
unsigned long ecx,

So writing:

                if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH_MONITOR))
                        clflush(&current_thread_info()->flags);

                __monitor(&current_thread_info()->flags, 0, 0);

ought to work just fine.

Thanks,

        Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/