3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> commit 93858769172c4e3678917810e9d5de360eb991cc upstream. A user reported a list corruption warning from btrfs_remove_ordered_extent, it is because we aren't taking the ordered_root_lock when we remove the inode from the ordered operations list. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c @@ -537,7 +537,9 @@ void btrfs_remove_ordered_extent(struct */ if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&tree->tree) && !mapping_tagged(inode->i_mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY)) { + spin_lock(&root->fs_info->ordered_root_lock); list_del_init(&BTRFS_I(inode)->ordered_operations); + spin_unlock(&root->fs_info->ordered_root_lock); } if (!root->nr_ordered_extents) { -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
