On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote:
>>>> On 17.12.13 at 23:34, "Luck, Tony" <tony.l...@intel.com> wrote:
>>>  No, it hasn't. But I explicitly checked the relevant EFI=n and EFI=y
>>> cases.
>>
>> I pushed your patch into my "next" tree - the robots will notice soon and
>> send us e-mail if they find any issues.
>
> Thanks, Tony. I'm afraid though that fixing this only in 3.14 would
> be a little late: Any "select" in a Kconfig results in the user not being
> asked again when that "select" goes away, so people having got EFI
> forcibly enabled in 3.13 and updating their configs to 3.14 would
> then need to remember to manually disable CONFIG_EFI again (of
> course that's already true for anyone using 3.13-rc?, but those
> should mostly be people more knowledgeable than folks just
> consuming final releases).
>
> I think it should generally be the exception to "select" options that
> have visible prompts (i.e. are user configurable).

Ingo: Jan makes a good point that people running "make oldconfig"
may get suckered into selecting CONFIG_EFI when they don't really
need it.  I've not seen any complaints from the robot randconfig testers,
so this patch is:

Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.l...@intel.com>

Can you push it to Linus before 3.13-final releases?

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to