On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:51:22AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 17:53 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > There is no reasons why an HVM guest shouldn't be allowed to use xenfb. > > As a matter of fact ARM guests, HVM from Linux POV, can use xenfb. > > Given that no Xen toolstacks configure a xenfb backend for x86 HVM > > guests, they are not affected. > > and if a toolstack did I think it would be reasonable to expect the > kernel to at least try and drive it! > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com> > > Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com>
I think David Vrabel is going to Nack it unless there is a test-case. I am saying that because in his previous statement for Wei's multi-page patches was that if there are no users (or at least no test-cases) then it should not be part of the kernel. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
