On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Wolfram Sang <w...@the-dreams.de> wrote: > >> >> +#define _P_DATA(bank, pin, name, sfx) >> >> \ >> >> + PINMUX_DATA(name##_DATA, name##_PMC_0, name##_PIPC_0, \ >> >> + name##_PIBC_1, name##_PBDC_1) >> >> + >> >> +#define _P_FN(n, fn, pfcae, pfce, pfc) >> >> \ >> >> + PINMUX_DATA(n##_MARK_FN##fn, n##_PMC_1, n##_PIPC_1, \ >> >> + n##_PFCAE_##pfcae, n##_PFCE_##pfce, n##_PFC_##pfc) >> > >> > I need to apply this patch, otherwise my i2c pinmuxing fails? >> >> Thanks. It looks to me like the _P_FN() bits would be mainly needed. >> Can you try to omit the _P_DATA() portion and check if it is still >> behaving as expected? > > Nope, doesn't work.
Ok, thanks for checking! / magnus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
