>The idea is to get equivalent performance to SCHED_FIFO. The results >show that much, and it is 100 times better than unprivileged >SCHED_NORMAL. The fact that this is an unoptimised normal desktop >environment means that the conclusion we _can_ draw is that SCHED_ISO is >as good as SCHED_FIFO for audio on the average desktop. I need someone
no, this isn't true. the performance you are getting isn't as good as SCHED_FIFO on a tuned system (h/w and s/w). the difference might be the fact that you have "an average desktop", or it might be that your desktop is just fine and SCHED_ISO actually is not as good as SCHED_FIFO. >with optimised hardware setup to see if it's as good as SCHED_FIFO in >the critical setup. agreed. i have every confidence that Lee and/or Jack will be forthcoming :) --p - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
