On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Yinghai Lu <ying...@kernel.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Yinghai Lu <ying...@kernel.org> wrote: >>> That bar could be 64bit pref mem and above 4G. >>> >>> -v2: refresh to 3.13-rc1 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <ying...@kernel.org> >>> Cc: David Airlie <airl...@linux.ie> >>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> >> >> This looks OK to me. Does it depend on any previous patches in this >> series? If not, I think Dave should pick it up. > > No. > > could be exposed after 5-9 get applied.
Doesn't that mean that this series should be reordered so this patch is *before* patches 5-9 to avoid bisection breakage? I know you've split up and reposted parts of the series, but the question still applies. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
