On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 05:01:21PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:23:46PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > > > + /* if we are currently stopped, then our CIV is actually set to our > > + * *last* sg segment and we are ready to wrap to the next. However, > > + * if we set our LVI to the last sg segment, then it won't wrap to > > + * the next sg segment, it won't even get a start. So, instead, when > > + * we are stopped, we increment the CIV value to the next sg segment > > + * to be played so that when we call start, things will operate > > + * properly > > + */ > > Is this (slightly altered) comment more to your liking? If so, > I'll post an additive patch for the 2.6 version...
IMHO the last sentence is still wrong. We're not touching the value of CIV at all. We're setting LVI to CIV + 1... OTOH, perhaps we should actually try implementing what the comment suggests? -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
