Once we have the per cpu patchset merged we could do the following [it
even works without that patchset but the __this_cpu ops will not do
preemption checks]. Would this work?


Subject: rcu: Avoid irq disable in rcu_cpu_kthread

The use of this_cpu ops avoids numerous address calculations
and allows to avoid the irq enable/disable sequence through a
low latency non locking this_cpu_xchg.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <c...@linux.com>

Index: linux/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h 2013-12-03 11:32:23.322999660 -0600
+++ linux/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h      2013-12-03 11:32:23.312999941 -0600
@@ -1417,33 +1417,29 @@ static int rcu_cpu_kthread_should_run(un
  */
 static void rcu_cpu_kthread(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-       unsigned int *statusp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_cpu_kthread_status);
-       char work, *workp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_cpu_has_work);
+       char work;
        int spincnt;

        for (spincnt = 0; spincnt < 10; spincnt++) {
                trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("Start CPU kthread@rcu_wait"));
                local_bh_disable();
-               *statusp = RCU_KTHREAD_RUNNING;
-               this_cpu_inc(rcu_cpu_kthread_loops);
-               local_irq_disable();
-               work = *workp;
-               *workp = 0;
-               local_irq_enable();
+               __this_cpu_write(rcu_cpu_kthread_status, RCU_KTHREAD_RUNNING);
+               __this_cpu_inc(rcu_cpu_kthread_loops);
+               work = this_cpu_xchg(rcu_cpu_has_work, 0);
                if (work)
                        rcu_kthread_do_work();
                local_bh_enable();
-               if (*workp == 0) {
+               if (__this_cpu_read(rcu_cpu_has_work) == 0) {
                        trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("End CPU kthread@rcu_wait"));
-                       *statusp = RCU_KTHREAD_WAITING;
+                       __this_cpu_write(rcu_cpu_kthread_status, 
RCU_KTHREAD_WAITING);
                        return;
                }
        }
-       *statusp = RCU_KTHREAD_YIELDING;
+       __this_cpu_write(rcu_cpu_kthread_status, RCU_KTHREAD_YIELDING);
        trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("Start CPU kthread@rcu_yield"));
        schedule_timeout_interruptible(2);
        trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("End CPU kthread@rcu_yield"));
-       *statusp = RCU_KTHREAD_WAITING;
+       __this_cpu_write(rcu_cpu_kthread_status, RCU_KTHREAD_WAITING);
 }

 /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to