this patch would have caught the bug in -BK-curr (that patch #1 fixes),
via a compiler warning. Test-built/booted on x86.
Ingo
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h.orig
+++ linux/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h
@@ -36,7 +36,10 @@ typedef struct {
#define SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED (spinlock_t) { 1 SPINLOCK_MAGIC_INIT }
-#define spin_lock_init(x) do { *(x) = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; } while(0)
+static inline void spin_lock_init(spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ *lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
+}
/*
* Simple spin lock operations. There are two variants, one clears IRQ's
@@ -45,8 +48,17 @@ typedef struct {
* We make no fairness assumptions. They have a cost.
*/
-#define spin_is_locked(x) (*(volatile signed char *)(&(x)->lock) <= 0)
-#define spin_unlock_wait(x) do { barrier(); } while(spin_is_locked(x))
+static inline int spin_is_locked(spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ return *(volatile signed char *)(&lock->lock) <= 0;
+}
+
+static inline void spin_unlock_wait(spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ do {
+ barrier();
+ } while (spin_is_locked(lock));
+}
#define spin_lock_string \
"\n1:\t" \
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
