Hi! > > > > > Thanks for trying it out. I have quite accurate time here on my > > > > > systems, and sleep works as it should. I wonder what's happening on > > > > > your system? If you have a chance, could you please post the results > > > > > from following simple tests? > > > > > > > > On patched 2.6.11-rc1: > > > > > > > > [Heh, clock is two times too fast, perhaps that makes ntpdate fail? -- > > > > yes. > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# dmesg | grep -i time; for i in 1 2 3 4 5; do > > > > ntpdate -b tak.cesnet.cz && sleep 10; done ; date && sleep 10 && date; > > > > while [ 1 ]; do date; done | uniq > > > > PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:11.5 to 64 > > > > dyn-tick: Enabling dynamic tick timer > > > > dyn-tick: Timer using dynamic tick > > > > > > Thanks. Looks like you're running on PIT only, I guess my patch > > > currently breaks PIT (and possibly HPET) No dmesg message for " > > > "Using XXX for high-res timesource". > > > > This machine definitely has TSC... What do I have to do in .config to > > make it do something interesting? My .config is: > > I suspect it's the HPET_TIMER, see below. CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER is > optional, otherwise TSC is used.
Okay, so I tried to measure power consumption. Patched kernel seems to be about 200mW better. That's on 22W... I'll see if I can tweak ACPI somehow to decrease it a bit more. Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/