Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 05:36:20PM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu: > * Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org> wrote: > > 2013-12-02 (월), 13:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar: > > > So basically, in the end I think it should be possible to have the > > > following behavior:
> > > perf record -a -e cycles sleep 1 > > > perf report stat # Reports as if we ran: 'perf stat -a -e > > > cycles sleep 1' > > > perf report # Reports the usual histogram > > > perf report --stat # Reports the perf stat output and the > > > histogram > > > or so. > > I don't think we need both of 'perf report stat' and 'perf report > > --stat'. At least it looks somewhat confusing to users IMHO. > Okay. Maybe the --stat option would be the more logical choice, > because '--' options can be added arbitrarily, while it would be weird > to add multiple subcommand options. > So basically there would be two options: > --show-stat [--no-show-stat] > --show-histogram [--no-show-histogram] > Today --show-histogram is the only one enabled by default. > Running: > perf report --no-show-histogram --show-stat Why not: perf stat -i perf.data and make it be an optional argument, so plain: perf stat -i would process perf.data, i.e. would get the samples, accrue the periods, calculate the time, etc and then present it as 'perf stat <some target>'. Right now 'perf stat -i' i used for '--no-inherit', perhaps we can just have --no-inherit have no short option and grab -i to have the same meaning as in 'report', 'script', etc. - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
