[trimming of cc list since this has nothing to see with the thread] El Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:12:05 -0500 John Richard Moser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> so you want 90-200 split out patches for GrSecurity? Documentation/SubmittingPatches.txt is all you need to read. There has been a lot of good projects that have failed just because they sat around saying "my stuff is better" without caring about how to merge it or without listening other kernel developers. Then someone reimplemented it better and submitted it in a way it could be handled, and listened to other developers, and it got in the kernel and everybody helped to make it better than the first alternative. Kbuild is a good examle of this So, if you want to have have PAX or grsecurity in the kernel, you probably should submit patches (in the way described in SubmittingPatches.txt) and if everybody agrees that it's better and you listen other developers and make changes accordingly and you don't say "$SOMEPERSON is just a scheduler developer" perhaps it'll be merged. Of course that's more difficult since people has already cared about doing all that work with ES and it's already working OK for thousand of people. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
