On 11/28/13, 8:38 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:32 AM, David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> wrote:

[SNIP]
+static bool is_idle_sample(struct perf_sample *sample,
+                          struct perf_evsel *evsel,
+                          struct machine *machine)
+{
+       struct thread *thread;
+       struct callchain_cursor *cursor = &callchain_cursor;
+       struct callchain_cursor_node *node;
+       struct addr_location al;
+       int iter = 5;

Shouldn't it be sched->max_stack somehow?

max_stack is used to dump callstack to the user. In this case we are walking the stack looking for an idle symbol.


+
+       /* pid 0 == swapper == idle task */
+       if (sample->pid == 0)
+               return true;
+
+       /* want main thread for process - has maps */
+       thread = machine__findnew_thread(machine, sample->pid, sample->pid);
+       if (thread == NULL) {
+               pr_debug("Failed to get thread for pid %d.\n", sample->pid);
+               return false;
+       }
+
+       if (!symbol_conf.use_callchain || sample->callchain == NULL)
+               return false;
+
+       if (machine__resolve_callchain(machine, evsel, thread,
+                                       sample, NULL, &al, 
PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH) != 0) {
+               if (verbose)
+                       error("Failed to resolve callchain. Skipping\n");
+
+               return false;
+       }

I think this callchain resolving logic should be moved to the
beginning of perf_hist__process_sample() like other commands do.  It's
not for idle threads only.

I'll see what can be done.


And it also needs to pass sched->max_stack.

Per above, max_stack has a different purpose



+       callchain_cursor_commit(cursor);
+
+       /* idle symbol should be early in the stack */
+       while (iter) {
+               node = callchain_cursor_current(cursor);
+               if (!node)
+                       break;
+
+               if (symbol__is_idle(node->sym))
+                       return true;
+
+               callchain_cursor_advance(cursor);
+
+               iter--;
+       }
+
+       return false;
+}

[SNIP]
+       /* show wakeups if requested */
+       if (sched->show_wakeups && !sched->summary_only)

Hmm.. maybe we can emit a warning if -w and -s options are given at
the same time.

ok.



+               timehist_print_wakeup_event(sched, sample, machine, thread);
+
+       return 0;
+}

[SNIP]
+static int parse_target_str(struct perf_sched *sched)
+{
+       if (sched->target.pid) {
+               sched->pid = intlist__new(sched->target.pid);
+               if (sched->pid == NULL) {
+                       pr_err("Error parsing process id string\n");
+                       return -EINVAL;
+               }
+       }
+
+       if (sched->target.tid) {
+               sched->tid = intlist__new(sched->target.tid);
+               if (sched->tid == NULL) {
+                       pr_err("Error parsing thread id string\n");


Need to call intlist__delete(sched->pid) here?

indeed. thanks.


+       const struct option timehist_options[] = {
+       OPT_STRING('i', "input", &input_name, "file",
+                   "input file name"),
+       OPT_INCR('v', "verbose", &verbose,
+                   "be more verbose (show symbol address, etc)"),
+       OPT_STRING('k', "vmlinux", &symbol_conf.vmlinux_name,
+                  "file", "vmlinux pathname"),
+       OPT_STRING(0, "kallsyms", &symbol_conf.kallsyms_name,
+                  "file", "kallsyms pathname"),
+       OPT_STRING('c', "comms", &symbol_conf.comm_list_str, "comm[,comm...]",
+                  "only display events for these comms"),
+       OPT_STRING('p', "pid", &sched.target.pid, "pid",
+                  "analyze events only for given process id(s)"),
+       OPT_STRING('t', "tid", &sched.target.tid, "tid",
+                   "analyze events only for given thread id(s)"),
+       OPT_BOOLEAN('g', "call-graph", &sched.show_callchain,
+                   "Display call chains if present (default on)"),
+       OPT_UINTEGER(0, "max-stack", &sched.max_stack,
+                  "Maximum number of functions to display backtrace."),
+       OPT_STRING('x', "excl", &excl_sym_list_str, "sym[,sym...]",

Why not renaming long option name to --exclude or --exclude-symbols?

ok.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to