On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:14:32 -0500, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:56:21 -0800 (PST), Martins Krikis > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>--- Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Check your inbox from months ago ;-) AFAICS his current version > >>>addresses all the comments from Alan and myself, from when it hit > >>>lkml 6 > >>>months(?) ago... > >>> > >>>I'll give it another quick lookover though, sure. > >> > >>Jeff, > >> > >>As long as 2.4.30 is planned at all, I have no more > >>worries for the moment. But if so, then please don't > >>waste your time looking over the current version. In > >>about a week there should really be another one out. > >>It will add RAID10, and get rid of the "claim disks > >>for RAID" mis-feature. I'll let everybody know, of course. > > > > > > I'm just curious. Is there already a possibility to use > > RAID10 metadata in 2.6.x kernels? > > Intel or 'md' metadata?
Intel > You need dmraid to use the Intel proprietary format. I'm not sure if it > supports RAID10 yet, but it supports the other levels. I know about other levels, I'm asking about RAID10. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
