Eric, Nik, Andy, Thanks for your comments.
I'll investigate the override option approach first, and then will re-implement the patch using RCU with corresponding Documentation/networking/bonding.txt changes, if still needed. P.S. Sorry for delay with my reply. It was caused by personal reasons. Best Regards, Anton On 21/11/2013 17:37, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: > On 11/21/2013 04:32 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 16:55 +0200, Anton Nayshtut wrote: >>> This patches introduces L2DA bonding module with all the data structures and >>> interfaces. It's not integrated yet. >> >> I veto any kind of new bonding mode not using RCU. >> >> Adding another rwlock in 2013 is simply not an option. >> >> Thanks >> >> > +1 > Also, > I haven't read the patch-set closely but based on the description in the first > patch I think you can already get this (or very similar) functionality by > using > the slave override option in the bonding. You can match the destination L2 > address and override the slave based on that. > > Nik > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
