Hello, On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 08:43:55AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > So, we do have cases where the parent is removed before the child. I > > suppose the parent pci bridge is removed already? AFAICS this > > shouldn't break anything but people did seem to expect the removals to > > be ordered from child to parent. Bjorn, is this something you expect > > to happened? > > I do not expect a PCI bridge to be removed before the devices below > it. We should be removing all the children before removing the parent > bridge. > > But is this related to PCI? I don't see the connection yet. I tried
I'm not sure. It was from thunderbolt and nobody is reporting it on other interconnects, so it could be. > to look into this a bit (my notes are at > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65281), but I haven't > figured out the big-picture problem yet. > > I don't have warm fuzzies that adding a "have we already removed this" > check is the best resolution, but maybe that's just because I don't > understand the problem. Yeah, the whole thing is sorta pointless. Just issuing removal and continuing on should do, IMHO. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
