On Tue 19-11-13 02:26:30, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 05:45:33PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > dead. If it was an important filesystem in your system, the whole system is
> > unusable. In kernel, we don't know whether the filesystem was important or
> > not. So KERN_EMERG isn't adequate in all the cases but KERN_CRIT is
> > neither. What if we made that message print also device name (it would be
> > more useful anyway in that case) and you could then filter out messages for
> > unimportant devices in syslogd?
>
> What is important or unimportant? In todays world I don't think a fs
> dying is nessecarily criticial. A root filesystem might be, but so
> might be any devices that is a single point of failure required for
> operation.
Agreed. And that is a reason to keep messages KERN_EMERG or change them
to KERN_CRIT? I can see arguments in both ways and so I don't feel a strong
incentive to change what we have now...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
