On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:19:07PM +0000, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> get_wchan() is lockless. Task may wakeup at any time and change its own stack,
> thus each next stack frame may be overwritten and filled with random stuff.
> 
> /proc/$pid/stack interface had been disabled for non-current tasks, see [1]
> But 'wchan' still allows to trigger stack frame unwinding on volatile stack.
> 
> This patch fixes oops in unwind_frame() by adding stack pointer validation on
> each step (as x86 code do), unwind_frame() already checks frame pointer.
> 
> Also I've found another report of this oops on stackoverflow (irony).

For that comment alone:

  Acked-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>

[also, the patch looks sane to me].

Will

> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]>
> Cc: Vyacheslav Tyrtov <[email protected]>
> Link: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg110589.html [1]
> Link: 
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18479894/unwind-frame-cause-a-kernel-paging-error
> ---
>  arch/arm/kernel/process.c |    7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
> index 94f6b05..92f7b15 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
> @@ -404,6 +404,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_fpu);
>  unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
>  {
>       struct stackframe frame;
> +     unsigned long stack_page;
>       int count = 0;
>       if (!p || p == current || p->state == TASK_RUNNING)
>               return 0;
> @@ -412,9 +413,11 @@ unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
>       frame.sp = thread_saved_sp(p);
>       frame.lr = 0;                   /* recovered from the stack */
>       frame.pc = thread_saved_pc(p);
> +     stack_page = (unsigned long)task_stack_page(p);
>       do {
> -             int ret = unwind_frame(&frame);
> -             if (ret < 0)
> +             if (frame.sp < stack_page ||
> +                 frame.sp >= stack_page + THREAD_SIZE ||
> +                 unwind_frame(&frame) < 0)
>                       return 0;
>               if (!in_sched_functions(frame.pc))
>                       return frame.pc;
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to