On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:52:03PM +0000, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > This patch adds support for using subdevices within syscon node. > Primary usage of this is describe all devices with same memory > region in one container.
I think if you need to do this, you should not be using syscon. What exactly is your use-case? I don't like the idea of treating syscon like a bus or container in this fashion. Mark. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_w...@mail.ru> > --- > drivers/mfd/syscon.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/syscon.c b/drivers/mfd/syscon.c > index 71841f9..6e9244a 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/syscon.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/syscon.c > @@ -152,6 +152,9 @@ static int syscon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, syscon); > > + if (of_platform_populate(dev->of_node, NULL, NULL, dev)) > + dev_warn(dev, "Fail to create subdevices\n"); > + > dev_info(dev, "regmap %pR registered\n", res); > > return 0; > -- > 1.8.1.5 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
