* Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Otherwise we might not reboot when the user needs it the most (early
> on).
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> This is exactly the same as in the previous try, but now alone since it was
> mudded by largely irrelevant patches in the series.
>
> kernel/panic.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c
> index b6c482c..46e37ff 100644
> --- a/kernel/panic.c
> +++ b/kernel/panic.c
> @@ -468,9 +468,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__stack_chk_fail);
>
> #endif
>
> -core_param(panic, panic_timeout, int, 0644);
> core_param(pause_on_oops, pause_on_oops, int, 0644);
>
> +static int __init set_panic_timeout(char *str)
> +{
> + int timeout;
> +
> + if (!get_option(&str, &timeout))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + panic_timeout = timeout;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +early_param("panic_timeout", set_panic_timeout);
> +
This still has the problem I pointed out for your v1 patch: for simple
integer parameters simple_strtol() is better and (a tiny bit) faster.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
