On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:07:37PM +0000, Vinayak Kale wrote: >> Add support for irq registration when pmu interrupt is percpu. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Kale <vk...@apm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Tuan Phan <tp...@apm.com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 109 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- >> 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c >> index cea1594..e60dae3 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c >> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ >> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct perf_event * [ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS], hw_events); >> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long [BITS_TO_LONGS(ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS)], >> used_mask); >> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pmu_hw_events, cpu_hw_events); >> +static bool is_percpuirq; > > This isn't a global property; it should be part of the struct arm_pmu. > The rest of the patch looks ok, but obvious requires you to merge the core > changes first.
Okay. I will incorporate above change in next revision once the core changes are agreed upon. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
