On 11/08, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:11:06AM -0500, suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com wrote: > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h > > b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h > > index d3f5c63..26609bb 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h > > @@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ > > #define X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT (6*32+22) /* topology extensions CPUID > > leafs */ > > #define X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE (6*32+23) /* core performance counter > > extensions */ > > #define X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_NB (6*32+24) /* NB performance counter > > extensions */ > > +#define X86_FEATURE_BPEXT (6*32+26) /* data breakpoint extension */ > > Does this feature only work on data breakpoint or is instruction breakpoint > address range supported as well?
IIRC, execute range is supported as well. But. I can't look at the code now, but iirc this can't really work until we fix the (already discussed) problems with bp_len && X86_BREAKPOINT_LEN_X. IOW, we should not blame these patches if it doesn't work. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
