On 11/06/13 04:07, Vinayak Kale wrote: > This patch series adds support to handle interrupt registration/deregistration > in arm64 pmu driver when pmu interrupt type is percpu. > > Patches in this patch series were previously sent out as separate patches [1]. > This patch series incorporates comments/fixes suggested for original patches. > > [1] > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-October/205888.html > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-October/204414.html > > > Vinayak Kale (2): > genirq: error reporting in request_percpu_irq() and > request_threaded_irq() > arm64: perf: add support for percpu pmu interrupt > > arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 109 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > kernel/irq/manage.c | 12 +++-- > 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) >
What ever happened to the approach here[1]? It doesn't look very nice to have to request the irq first as a per-cpu interrupt and then try as a non-percpu interrupt when genirq already knows if its per-cpu or not. [1] http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1207.3/02955.html -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
