Hello Jingbai,

(2013/11/07 17:58), Jingbai Ma wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 10:23 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:21:39AM +0000, Atsushi Kumagai wrote:
>>> (2013/11/06 5:27), Vivek Goyal wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:45:32PM +0800, Jingbai Ma wrote:
>>>>> This patch set intend to exclude unnecessary hugepages from vmcore dump 
>>>>> file.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch requires the kernel patch to export necessary data structures 
>>>>> into
>>>>> vmcore: "kexec: export hugepage data structure into vmcoreinfo"
>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2013-November/009997.html
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch introduce two new dump levels 32 and 64 to exclude all unused 
>>>>> and
>>>>> active hugepages. The level to exclude all unnecessary pages will be 127 
>>>>> now.
>>>>
>>>> Interesting. Why hugepages should be treated any differentely than normal
>>>> pages?
>>>>
>>>> If user asked to filter out free page, then it should be filtered and
>>>> it should not matter whether it is a huge page or not?
>>>
>>> I'm making a RFC patch of hugepages filtering based on such policy.
>>>
>>> I attach the prototype version.
>>> It's able to filter out also THPs, and suitable for cyclic processing
>>> because it depends on mem_map and looking up it can be divided into
>>> cycles. This is the same idea as page_is_buddy().
>>>
>>> So I think it's better.
>>
>> Agreed. Being able to treat hugepages in same manner as other pages
>> sounds good.
>>
>> Jingbai, looks good to you?
>
> It looks good to me.
>
> My only concern is by this way, we only can exclude all hugepage together, 
> but can't exclude the free hugepages only. I'm not sure if user need to dump 
> out the activated hugepage only.
>
> Kumagai-san, please correct me, if I'm wrong.

Yes, my patch treats all allocated hugetlbfs pages as user pages,
doesn't distinguish whether the pages are actually used or not.
I made so because I guess it's enough for almost all users.

We can introduce new dump level after it's needed actually,
but I don't think now is the time. To introduce it without
demand will make this tool just more complex.


Thanks
Atsushi Kumagai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to