Hi Arnaldo,
On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 10:42:10 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:52:43PM +0000, Rodrigo Campos escreveu:
>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:09:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> > @@ -486,15 +425,15 @@ struct hist_entry *__hists__add_entry(struct hists
>> > *hists,
>> > .stat = {
>> > - .period = period,
>> > .nr_events = 1,
>> > + .period = period,
>> > .weight = weight,
>> > },
>
>> Isn't this seems unrelated and unneeded ?
>
>> The "period" field is before the "nr_events" field in the struct, so maybe is
>> more clear to leave it as it was ? The actual relative order (it has some
>> more
>> fields) in the struct is: period, weigth, nr_events. Might be better if they
>> match that order here ? Although not sure since we are using the fields with
>> name and is clear enough.
>
> Yeah, this shouldn't be there, I thought about fixing this up to reduce
> the patch size, but ended up being lenient.
>
> Namhyung, please avoid such unneeded patch churn :-)
Okay, I'll keep it in mind.
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
