On 11/05, David Long wrote: > > On 11/04/13 14:49, Oleg Nesterov wrote: >> On 10/29, Oleg Nesterov wrote: >>> >> Seriouly, how about the patch below? >> >> In fact, given that you are going to reimplement set_swbp/orig_insn, >> the new member is not strictly needed (afaics). But it looks more >> clear this way, and we need s/MAX_UINSN_BYTES/sizeof()/ anyway. >> >> Oleg. >> --- > > I agree that this is cleaner than another weak callout. I have it > working for ARM now.
OK, I am going to add this patch to my tree, thanks. Can I add your acked-by ? Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
