Hi,
As I was coding something like this:
static struct spi_ioc_transfer *xfer;
struct spi_frame *rx_frame;
xfer = calloc(nb, sizeof(*xfer));
for (i = 0; i < nb; i++) {
xfer[i].tx_buf = (unsigned long)tx_buf;
xfer[i].rx_buf = (unsigned long)rx_buf;
xfer[i].len = 0;
}
err = ioctl(spi_data->fd, SPI_IOC_MESSAGE(nb), xfer);
I ran into a bug in spi-atmel.c
NB: The zero-length SPI message was not intentional, it was just a bug in my
software.
[ 13.593750] spidev spi1.1: xfer len 0 rx tx cs 8bits 150 usec 18000000Hz
[ 13.601562] spidev spi1.1: xfer len 0 rx tx cs 8bits 150 usec 18000000Hz
[ 13.601562] spidev spi1.1: xfer len 0 rx tx cs 8bits 150 usec 18000000Hz
[ 13.609375] spidev spi1.1: xfer len 0 rx tx cs 8bits 150 usec 18000000Hz
[ 13.617187] spidev spi1.1: xfer len 0 rx tx cs 8bits 150 usec 18000000Hz
[ 13.625000] spidev spi1.1: xfer len 0 rx tx cs 8bits 150 usec 18000000Hz
[ 13.632812] spidev spi1.1: xfer len 0 rx tx cs 8bits 150 usec 18000000Hz
[ 13.632812] atmel_spi f0004000.spi: new message c7b49ec4 submitted for spi1.1
[ 13.632812] atmel_spi f0004000.spi: start message c7b49ec4 for spi1.1
[ 13.632812] spidev spi1.1: activate 16, mr 000d0031
[ 13.632812] atmel_spi f0004000.spi: atmel_spi_next_xfer_pio
[ 13.632812] atmel_spi f0004000.spi: start pio xfer c79d80c0: len 0 tx
c6e00000 rx c6e00000 bitpw 8
[ 13.632812] irq 29: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
[ 13.632812] CPU: 0 PID: 494 Comm: multichannel Not tainted 3.11.2 #1
[ 13.632812] [<c0012e20>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xe0) from [<c0010bb8>]
(show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[ 13.632812] [<c0010bb8>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) from [<c004d5b4>]
(__report_bad_irq+0x1c/0xb4)
[ 13.632812] [<c004d5b4>] (__report_bad_irq+0x1c/0xb4) from [<c004d9ac>]
(note_interrupt+0x178/0x234)
[ 13.632812] [<c004d9ac>] (note_interrupt+0x178/0x234) from [<c004c078>]
(handle_irq_event_percpu+0x170/0x1a0)
[ 13.632812] [<c004c078>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x170/0x1a0) from
[<c004c0d0>] (handle_irq_event+0x28/0x38)
[ 13.632812] [<c004c0d0>] (handle_irq_event+0x28/0x38) from [<c004e57c>]
(handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa4/0xe4)
[ 13.632812] [<c004e57c>] (handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa4/0xe4) from [<c004b910>]
(generic_handle_irq+0x20/0x30)
[ 13.632812] [<c004b910>] (generic_handle_irq+0x20/0x30) from [<c000f3e8>]
(handle_IRQ+0x60/0x84)
[ 13.632812] [<c000f3e8>] (handle_IRQ+0x60/0x84) from [<c00115e0>]
(__irq_svc+0x40/0x4c)
[ 13.632812] [<c00115e0>] (__irq_svc+0x40/0x4c) from [<bf1293dc>]
(spidev_sync+0x6c/0x94 [spidev])
[ 13.632812] [<bf1293dc>] (spidev_sync+0x6c/0x94 [spidev]) from [<bf129b24>]
(spidev_ioctl+0x53c/0x66c [spidev])
[ 13.632812] [<bf129b24>] (spidev_ioctl+0x53c/0x66c [spidev]) from
[<c0087730>] (vfs_ioctl+0x28/0x3c)
[ 13.632812] [<c0087730>] (vfs_ioctl+0x28/0x3c) from [<c0088158>]
(do_vfs_ioctl+0x4e8/0x54c)
[ 13.632812] [<c0088158>] (do_vfs_ioctl+0x4e8/0x54c) from [<c00881f0>]
(SyS_ioctl+0x34/0x58)
[ 13.632812] [<c00881f0>] (SyS_ioctl+0x34/0x58) from [<c000e500>]
(ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x2c)
[ 13.632812] handlers:
[ 13.632812] [<bf01142c>] atmel_spi_pio_interrupt [spi_atmel]
[ 13.632812] Disabling IRQ #29
And that make me wonder what was the behavior to adopt in case of a zero-length
transfer ?
Should spidev.c just return ok without doing anything ? Should it return
-EINVAL ?
Or maybe we should activate/deactivate the chip select ?
Best regards,
Richard.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
