Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com> writes:
> Em Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 04:47:45PM -0700, Michael Hudson-Doyle escreveu:
>> -int percent_color_snprintf(char *bf, size_t size, const char *fmt, double
>> percent)
>> +int percent_color_snprintf(char *bf, size_t size, const char *fmt, ...)
>> {
>> - const char *color = get_percent_color(percent);
>> + va_list args;
>> + double percent;
>> + const char *color;
>> +
>> + va_start(args, fmt);
>> + percent = va_arg(args, double);
>> + va_end(args);
>> + color = get_percent_color(percent);
>> return color_snprintf(bf, size, color, fmt, percent);
>> }
>
> As a bug fix I'm merging this now, but I wonder if, since we're doing
> the va_start/end dance here, can't we call some color_vsnprintf variant
> so as to avoid doing it twice?
I thought that, but we need to get the percent argument anyway. I
couldn't decide if it was better to call color_vsnprintf with args or
color_snprintf with percent so I went for the laziest option / minimal
diff. Can clearly write a patch for the alternative if you like...
> I'll look into that after going thru more urgent stuff.
Thanks!
Cheers,
mwh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
