* Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote:
> >>> On 26.10.13 at 12:31, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
> > * Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote:
> >> I'd like to point out though that with __compiletime_object_size()
> >> being restricted to gcc before 4.6, the whole construct is going to
> >> become more and more pointless going forward. I would question
> >> however that commit 2fb0815c9ee6b9ac50e15dd8360ec76d9fa46a2 ("gcc4:
> >> disable __compiletime_object_size for GCC 4.6+") was really necessary,
> >> and instead this should have been dealt with as is done here from the
> >> beginning.
> >
> > Can we now revert 2fb0815c9ee6?
>
> Actually I'm afraid parisc would first need to follow the changes
> done on x86 here, or else they'd run into (compile time) issues
> (s390 and tile only emit warnings, i.e. would at worst suffer
> cosmetically unless subtrees putting -Werror in place are
> affected).
Given how trivial __compiletime_object_size() is, we could replicate
a (differently named) copy of that in x86 uaccess.h?
This is something that would be pretty platform dependent anyway.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
