i was digging around for info on TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT and found this claim in the thttpd mailing list archive: > Alexey Kuznestov mentioned to me that on SMP servers, this option may > not be desired as it creates a new contention point is this still the case? i haven't played with it yet, but i was going to add it to apache-2.0's portability layer (which already has freebsd's SO_ACCEPTFILTER support). is this one of those cases where kernel gurus would prefer me to put it into apache-2.0 and turn it on regardless of the current performance 'cause you guys think you can fix it? (lately i'm playing only with non-SMP boxes, and my viewpoint is kind of biased :) -dean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
