On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

> > > Its certainly misleading. I got Jeff to try making oom return
> > > 4999 out of 5000 times regardless.
> >
> > In that case, he _is_ OOM.  ;)
>
> Hardly
>
> > 1) (almost) no free memory
> > 2) no free swap
> > 3) very little pagecache + buffer cache
>
> Large amounts of cache, which went away when the OOM code was neutered

So Jeff backed out my patch before testing yours? ;)

Rik
--
Executive summary of a recent Microsoft press release:
   "we are concerned about the GNU General Public License (GPL)"


                http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/       http://distro.conectiva.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to