On 10/16, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:43:48PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Peter, just in case. I understand that this all is minor. Just I am > > confused. And in any case I do think we do not need __GFP_ZERO when > > it comes to PAGE_SIZE allocation. > > Yeah; we could probably avoid it; if only the strcpy functions would > return how many bytes they copied :/ Then we could create a nice little > helper to \0 the tail end for alignment. > > Anyway, as long as the resulting code is obvious and makes it hard to > leak something I'm fine.
OK. I'll wait for your review on this series, then send the next patch. d_path() case can clear the extra bytes, everything else can use a single if (name != buf) name = str*copy(tmp, buf); to avoid the leak. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/