I'm worrying that this patch becomes too late for backporting to 3.11-stable.
Since there is no objection, can this patch go?
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> This is a sad patch, but provided it actually generates similar code I
> suppose its the best we can do bar whole sale deprecating gcc-3.
Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Can the patch below go to 3.12-rcX (and the patch above to 3.11-stable which
> does the same thing)?
>
> Regards.
> ----------
> >From a1b01c858143c2c2c92b17e7df096042bfe0df6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-ker...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:44:17 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] mutex: Avoid gcc version dependent __builtin_constant_p()
> usage.
>
> Commit 040a0a37 "mutex: Add support for wound/wait style locks" used
> "!__builtin_constant_p(p == NULL)" but gcc 3.x cannot handle such expression
> correctly, leading to boot failure when built with CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES=y.
>
> Fix it by explicitly passing a bool which tells whether p != NULL or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-ker...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
> ---
> kernel/mutex.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/mutex.c b/kernel/mutex.c
> index 6d647ae..d24105b 100644
> --- a/kernel/mutex.c
> +++ b/kernel/mutex.c
> @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(struct ww_mutex *lock,
> static __always_inline int __sched
> __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
> struct lockdep_map *nest_lock, unsigned long ip,
> - struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx)
> + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, const bool use_ww_ctx)
> {
> struct task_struct *task = current;
> struct mutex_waiter waiter;
> @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state,
> unsigned int subclass,
> struct task_struct *owner;
> struct mspin_node node;
>
> - if (!__builtin_constant_p(ww_ctx == NULL) && ww_ctx->acquired >
> 0) {
> + if (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx->acquired > 0) {
> struct ww_mutex *ww;
>
> ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base);
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state,
> unsigned int subclass,
> if ((atomic_read(&lock->count) == 1) &&
> (atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->count, 1, 0) == 1)) {
> lock_acquired(&lock->dep_map, ip);
> - if (!__builtin_constant_p(ww_ctx == NULL)) {
> + if (use_ww_ctx) {
> struct ww_mutex *ww;
> ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base);
>
> @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ slowpath:
> goto err;
> }
>
> - if (!__builtin_constant_p(ww_ctx == NULL) && ww_ctx->acquired >
> 0) {
> + if (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx->acquired > 0) {
> ret = __mutex_lock_check_stamp(lock, ww_ctx);
> if (ret)
> goto err;
> @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ skip_wait:
> lock_acquired(&lock->dep_map, ip);
> mutex_set_owner(lock);
>
> - if (!__builtin_constant_p(ww_ctx == NULL)) {
> + if (use_ww_ctx) {
> struct ww_mutex *ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base);
> struct mutex_waiter *cur;
>
> @@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ mutex_lock_nested(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int
> subclass)
> {
> might_sleep();
> __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE,
> - subclass, NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL);
> + subclass, NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL, 0);
> }
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_lock_nested);
> @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ _mutex_lock_nest_lock(struct mutex *lock, struct
> lockdep_map *nest)
> {
> might_sleep();
> __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE,
> - 0, nest, _RET_IP_, NULL);
> + 0, nest, _RET_IP_, NULL, 0);
> }
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(_mutex_lock_nest_lock);
> @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ mutex_lock_killable_nested(struct mutex *lock, unsigned
> int subclass)
> {
> might_sleep();
> return __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_KILLABLE,
> - subclass, NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL);
> + subclass, NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL, 0);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_lock_killable_nested);
>
> @@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(struct mutex *lock,
> unsigned int subclass)
> {
> might_sleep();
> return __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
> - subclass, NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL);
> + subclass, NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL, 0);
> }
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_lock_interruptible_nested);
> @@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ __ww_mutex_lock(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct
> ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
>
> might_sleep();
> ret = __mutex_lock_common(&lock->base, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE,
> - 0, &ctx->dep_map, _RET_IP_, ctx);
> + 0, &ctx->dep_map, _RET_IP_, ctx, 1);
> if (!ret && ctx->acquired > 1)
> return ww_mutex_deadlock_injection(lock, ctx);
>
> @@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct ww_mutex *lock,
> struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
>
> might_sleep();
> ret = __mutex_lock_common(&lock->base, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
> - 0, &ctx->dep_map, _RET_IP_, ctx);
> + 0, &ctx->dep_map, _RET_IP_, ctx, 1);
>
> if (!ret && ctx->acquired > 1)
> return ww_mutex_deadlock_injection(lock, ctx);
> @@ -809,28 +809,28 @@ __mutex_lock_slowpath(atomic_t *lock_count)
> struct mutex *lock = container_of(lock_count, struct mutex, count);
>
> __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0,
> - NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL);
> + NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL, 0);
> }
>
> static noinline int __sched
> __mutex_lock_killable_slowpath(struct mutex *lock)
> {
> return __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_KILLABLE, 0,
> - NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL);
> + NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL, 0);
> }
>
> static noinline int __sched
> __mutex_lock_interruptible_slowpath(struct mutex *lock)
> {
> return __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 0,
> - NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL);
> + NULL, _RET_IP_, NULL, 0);
> }
>
> static noinline int __sched
> __ww_mutex_lock_slowpath(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> {
> return __mutex_lock_common(&lock->base, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0,
> - NULL, _RET_IP_, ctx);
> + NULL, _RET_IP_, ctx, 1);
> }
>
> static noinline int __sched
> @@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ __ww_mutex_lock_interruptible_slowpath(struct ww_mutex
> *lock,
> struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> {
> return __mutex_lock_common(&lock->base, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 0,
> - NULL, _RET_IP_, ctx);
> + NULL, _RET_IP_, ctx, 1);
> }
>
> #endif
> --
> 1.7.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
