3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>

commit bebcb928c820d0ee83aca4b192adc195e43e66a2 upstream.

The check if the queue is full and adding current to the wait queue of
pending msgsnd() operations (ss_add()) must be atomic.

Otherwise:
 - the thread that performs msgsnd() finds a full queue and decides to
   sleep.
 - the thread that performs msgrcv() first reads all messages from the
   queue and then sleeps, because the queue is empty.
 - the msgrcv() calls do not perform any wakeups, because the msgsnd()
   task has not yet called ss_add().
 - then the msgsnd()-thread first calls ss_add() and then sleeps.

Net result: msgsnd() and msgrcv() both sleep forever.

Observed with msgctl08 from ltp with a preemptible kernel.

Fix: Call ipc_lock_object() before performing the check.

The patch also moves security_msg_queue_msgsnd() under ipc_lock_object:
 - msgctl(IPC_SET) explicitely mentions that it tries to expunge any
   pending operations that are not allowed anymore with the new
   permissions.  If security_msg_queue_msgsnd() is called without locks,
   then there might be races.
 - it makes the patch much simpler.

Reported-and-tested-by: Vineet Gupta <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 ipc/msg.c |   12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/ipc/msg.c
+++ b/ipc/msg.c
@@ -680,16 +680,18 @@ long do_msgsnd(int msqid, long mtype, vo
                goto out_unlock1;
        }
 
+       ipc_lock_object(&msq->q_perm);
+
        for (;;) {
                struct msg_sender s;
 
                err = -EACCES;
                if (ipcperms(ns, &msq->q_perm, S_IWUGO))
-                       goto out_unlock1;
+                       goto out_unlock0;
 
                err = security_msg_queue_msgsnd(msq, msg, msgflg);
                if (err)
-                       goto out_unlock1;
+                       goto out_unlock0;
 
                if (msgsz + msq->q_cbytes <= msq->q_qbytes &&
                                1 + msq->q_qnum <= msq->q_qbytes) {
@@ -699,10 +701,9 @@ long do_msgsnd(int msqid, long mtype, vo
                /* queue full, wait: */
                if (msgflg & IPC_NOWAIT) {
                        err = -EAGAIN;
-                       goto out_unlock1;
+                       goto out_unlock0;
                }
 
-               ipc_lock_object(&msq->q_perm);
                ss_add(msq, &s);
 
                if (!ipc_rcu_getref(msq)) {
@@ -730,10 +731,7 @@ long do_msgsnd(int msqid, long mtype, vo
                        goto out_unlock0;
                }
 
-               ipc_unlock_object(&msq->q_perm);
        }
-
-       ipc_lock_object(&msq->q_perm);
        msq->q_lspid = task_tgid_vnr(current);
        msq->q_stime = get_seconds();
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to