* Christoph Lameter <c...@linux.com> wrote:
> > That won't cause email servers to reject the mails, it just makes the
> > patches a bit harder to review.
>
> I do not have any control over how my ISP sorts these emails. [...]
Your series from today has proper threading - so after all it _was_
possible for you to send a patch series correctly?
Note that you did not address the other problem that David Miller pointed
out, the Cc list still looks messed up:
Message-Id: <20131015180050.084352...@linux.com>
User-Agent: quilt/0.60-1
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:58:53 -0500
From: Christoph Lameter <c...@linux.com>
To: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
Cc: a...@linuxfoundation.org, "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Steven Rostedt <srost...@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] net: Replace __get_cpu_var uses
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
