On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 07:46:55AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > Indeed. Something like the updated version below? > > > > > > [ I kept the asm_volatile_goto() naming to make sure the implicit > > > volatile > > > is visible. ] > > > > Ingo, I applied this patch (as commit c015a7f0b746) on top of > > tip/sched/core > > > > 3354781a2184 "sched/numa: Reflow task_numa_group() to avoid a > > compiler warning" > > > > The below results show that it does fixed the many oops: > > Thanks Fengguang! > > I've added your Tested-by tag as well and have split the patch in two > parts: the upstream part with a -stable tag and the rmwcc.h part that goes > into the scheduler tree. > > If there are no objections I will send a pull request for the upstream > part to Linus later today.
Ingo, sorry I'm still waiting for more results to arrive so as to confirm whether the below "kernel_early_hang_without_any_printk_output" is a noise or reliably caused by the gcc patch: +-------------------------------------------------+--------------+--------------+ | | 3354781a2184 | c015a7f0b746 | +-------------------------------------------------+--------------+--------------+ | good_boots | 9 | 8 | | BUG:kernel_early_hang_without_any_printk_output | 0 | 1 | +-------------------------------------------------+--------------+--------------+ Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
