For atomic_clear_mask(), 'v->counter' is 'int', so it is better to use
'unsigned int' instead of 'unsigned long' for parameter 'mask' to make
atomic_clear_mask() itself consistency.
And atomic_[set/clear]_mask() are pairs, the modification can also let
them consistent with each other.
Although the original implementation can not cause bugs, it is still
better to let it improved.
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.c...@asianux.com>
---
include/asm-generic/atomic.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/atomic.h b/include/asm-generic/atomic.h
index 33bd2de..f31bff97 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/atomic.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/atomic.h
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static inline int __atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a,
int u)
* Atomically clears the bits set in @mask from @v
*/
#ifndef atomic_clear_mask
-static inline void atomic_clear_mask(unsigned long mask, atomic_t *v)
+static inline void atomic_clear_mask(unsigned int mask, atomic_t *v)
{
unsigned long flags;
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
